| Sub Title: | [SUNRISE Edition] |
|---|---|
| Start Page: | D04 |
| Companies: | Bureau
of ReclamationSic:921130Sic:9100 |
| Sic:921130Sic:9100 |
Bureau
of Reclamation will pay $2.8 million to 170 farmers who've agreed not to
plant crops on 16,000 acres this year, reducing water needs by 39,000
acre-feet. In addition, another 10 property owners will receive $1.2 million
for providing 37,000 acre-feet of well water to the Klamath Project. But
with annual water needs for fish, farmers and refuges now approaching
900,000 acre-feet, such water savings offer little relief.
Fish
and Wildlife Service ruled last week that Klamath Project irrigation
jeopardized sucker survival,
Bureau
of Reclamation officials said their options included seeking an
exemption from the so-called "God Squad," a Cabinet-level
committee that can choose to let species go extinct. But with a third fish
species now in jeopardy and a fourth Klamath
Basin fish -- wild steelhead -- likely to be added to the
endangered species list as early as next week, an exemption appears
unlikely.| Full Text: | |
| Copyright Oregonian Publishing Company Mar 21, 2001 |
Summary: A federal agency finds fault with another's plans for irrigation that don't protect endangered species
Irrigation-as-usual at the massive Klamath Project this drought year jeopardizes the survival of the Klamath River's dwindling run of wild coho salmon.
As expected, the National Marine Fisheries Service on Monday found that
the
Bureau
of Reclamation's plans for irrigating 240,000 acres of farm fields poses
an "unacceptable risk" to salmon fry in spring, juvenile coho in
summer and returning spawners in fall.
In addition, the agency's draft biological opinion on ongoing Klamath Project operations found that continuing irrigation would further degrade salmon habitat already impoverished by logging, road building, grazing, mining, urbanization, stream channelization, dams, wetland loss, unscreened irrigation diversions and water withdrawals.
To avoid harming Klamath River coho salmon, which were listed as
threatened in 1997, the National Marine Fisheries Service told the
Bureau
of Reclamation to more than triple river flows at the height of the
irrigation season.
Last week, the
U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service told the
Bureau
of Reclamation to raise the level of Upper Klamath Lake one foot to
avoid harming Lost River and shortnose suckers, which were listed as
endangered in 1988. The federal Endangered Species Act prohibits federal
agencies such as the
Bureau
of Reclamation from actions that harm protected species.
With inflow at Upper Klamath Lake expected to be just 29 percent of
average this irrigation season,
Bureau
of Reclamation officials already are forecasting shortages.
"It's looking kind of bleak, very bleak," said Bob Davis, chief
of the
Bureau
of Reclamation's Natural Resource's Division in the Klamath Basin.
"We will develop our annual operating plan for 2001 to take into
account the Endangered Species Act and tribal trust needs and to make
deliveries that may remain in the pitcher for irrigated agriculture and
wildlife refuges."
When the
Fish
and Wildlife Service ruled last week that Klamath Project irrigation
jeopardized sucker survival,
Bureau
of Reclamation officials said their options included seeking an
exemption from the so-called "God Squad," a Cabinet-level
committee that can choose to let species go extinct. But with a third fish
species now in jeopardy and a fourth Klamath Basin fish -- wild steelhead --
likely to be added to the endangered species list as early as next week, an
exemption appears unlikely.
"We're not advocating an exemption process," Davis said. " If we can come up with some ways to add flexibility back into the system, that's our best hope at this point."
The
Bureau
of Reclamation will pay $2.8 million to 170 farmers who've agreed not to
plant crops on 16,000 acres this year, reducing water needs by 39,000
acre-feet. In addition, another 10 property owners will receive $1.2 million
for providing 37,000 acre-feet of well water to the Klamath Project. But
with annual water needs for fish, farmers and refuges now approaching
900,000 acre-feet, such water savings offer little relief.
"There is no silver bullet," said Bob Hunter of WaterWatch of
Oregon.
"The reality is we've overallocated the water, and we need to reduce
basically the irrigation demand, and that means downsizing the
project."
In past years, the Tulelake Irrigation District in Northern California already would be drawing Klamath Project water to prime 260 miles of canals and allow farmers to moisten their fields for spring planting.
"Usually we're in high gear now, moving right along; the tractors are all out working and the farmers are busy," said Jerry Pyle, assistant manager of the irrigation district. "Now they're sitting in meetings trying to decide what to do next to get some political help here. It's really hard sitting here."